Happily Ever After

“Living happily ever after” is not just a phrase that is used in movies but it actually means living a “happily ever after” life in real life too. According to the argument put forwarded by Aristotle, goals in life are valued on the basis of their importance simply to the degree that they connect to happiness in the end. In the research related to Subjective Well-Being i.e. SWB, the good life is equal to extent of happiness. It has been accepted time and again that it is a common desire among the human beings to seek and find happiness as a major life goal (Aristotle 24).

Purpose of Life

When we talk about meaningful life, it usually includes a determined wish to achieve something or a sense of solid intention. A good and well-lived life is one that is characterized by meaningful prospects and actions. It is a fact that a lot of people who seek happiness try to find it by having a sense of meaning. Most of the human beings struggle really hard to find a genuine purpose in life as a common goal. It is extremely necessary to mention here that an individual may have bad and painful experiences but may still hold on to a strong determination and certainty about a unified purpose. As far as moral goodness in Aristotle’s view is concerned, he holds the opinion that one’s life must be devoted to acquire a meaningful purpose especially one by which others get benefitted on an unconditional basis (Cameron).

Aristotle’s writings

Aristotle’s writings are considered as those which have great influence on the mindset of the Western society and civilization. In his work Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle has significantly explored the ideas related to moral values, God, character and happiness. He has debated a number of issues related to the mentioned subject areas. Moral virtue has been defined by him as an outlook to conduct oneself in the desirable way and as a representation of extremes of insufficiency and surplus both of which are considered as vices (Aristotle 159).

Happiness Attained by Soul Satisfaction

According to his opinions as found in a number of literatures related to psychology of happiness, a happy life is attainable only if the soul (along with its every part) carries out its functions in the most appropriate manner. He has been reported to reiterate every now and then that a well-lived life is only attainable if the desirable functions are performed by the individual with the highest degree of morality and excellence. It is rather difficult to ignore the prevailing fact that the developed societies are undergoing a number of problems even though there has been tremendous advancement in every aspect of life. In a majority of cases, people do not find it easy to point out what is the lacking in their prosperous lives. They feel alienated, experience hollow relationships and social structures. This midlife crisis is the result of a lack of morality and sense of looseness derived from it. Thus, Aristotle’s view that eudemonia i.e. happiness must be the ultimate goal of an individual’s life (Cameron).

Attain Spiritual Good

Aristotle believes that the whole human body has a significant function just like every single part has a particular function to perform. And these functions are the main reason why human beings can be easily distinguished from other creatures. He maintains the idea throughout his works that human beings must strive for knowing what is best for them. He believes that such an understanding is necessary to acquire the real meaning of life and happiness. He does not encourage finding happiness in materialistic objects. Rather, he suggests human beings to strive to achieve the highest form of eudaimonia i.e. happiness that makes a person spiritually strong. Aristotle has provided a unique explanation of happiness in his function argument. His idea of living happily is entirely different when compared with a number of scholars of his age. However, he has a logical side to his argument when he insists human beings to function in order to attain spiritual good (King & Napa 157).

Money Can’t Buy Happiness

He insists that happiness has nothing to do with money. It is just a myth that money brings happiness in the lives of people. Very rich and prosperous people have pains that cannot be understood by those who have no means to attain the status enjoyed by the former. Thus, it depends on the use of the money whether it is a role in one’s happiness or unhappiness. Aristotle finds money as a dehumanizing element in attaining happiness that lasts long. Thus, it can be said that it is a favor by God if a person has a lot of money. It has nothing to do with morality or being good as a person. A good and a well-lived life have nothing to do with monetary benefits achieved and enjoyed by any human being. A well-lived life is one wherein a person enjoys the moral goodness, a sense of conscience and “not only the amount of meaningful activity engaged in but also the amount of happiness the person enjoys” (King & Napa 164). When money is compared with meaningful purpose, morality and happiness, it can be observed that the former has little value in life.

Conclusion

In a general sense, Aristotle’s function argument reveals that the good of human beings lies in the supremacy of raison d’être.

References

Aristotle. The Nicomachean Ethics. USA: Filiquarian Publications, 2007. Print.

Cameron, D. “Aristotle Got It Right; Well-Being, Not Just Wealth, Should Mark the Progress of Our Societies.” Newsweek International 7 May 2007: n. pag. Questia. Web. 22 Sept. 2013. <http://www.questia.com/read/1G1-162808221/aristotle-got-it-right-well-being-not-just-wealth>.

King, L. A, & Napa C. K. “What Makes a Life Good?.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75.1 (1998): 156-165.MYSMU. Web. 22 Sept. 2013. <http://www.mysmu.edu/faculty/cscollon/King_Napa_1998.pdf>.

The post Aristotle Views on Happiness in Life appeared first on Mark8ng.com.

Tennessee Williams’ “Cat on a Hot Tin Roof” is an interesting yet inspirational play that revolves around an ostensibly hollow relationship between Brick and Maggie, the two leading characters. As far as Maggie is concerned, her marital life is matched up to the life of a cat living on a hot tin roof. Hence, the play’s title makes the reader comprehend the Brick’s and Maggie’s relationship – a knotty and complicated one. The reason is simple i.e. Brick’s dilemma over his gender inclination. Due to his failure as a homosexual, Brick also detests being a heterosexual. In addition, he is annoyed by Maggie as she is seen worsening the life of Skipper – Brick’s homosexual friend at one occasion (Williams).

It is easily observable that Brick cannot stand Maggie’s presence but still manages to endure her. He neither likes to talk nor respond to her. Their marriage was once great bit eventually malformed. If the truth is told, he tied the knot with her for proving his heterosexuality and succeeded in doing so. However, their marriage fell apart with the passage of time. Whereas Maggie yearns for her husband’s love and attention, Brick is not interested. Believing that she can sustain her troubled married life, she compares herself to the cat who thinks she can live on a hot tin roof. However, she does not get triumphant in winning the love of her husband considering his emptiness and lack of concern for her (Williams). To cut a long story short, it can be said that the relationship between Maggie and Brick is like a broken glass whereby the woman constantly tries to recreate it but fails.

Reference

Williams, Tennessee. Cat on a hot tin roof. Stuttgart: Reclam, 2013. Print.

The post Brick and Maggie Relationship in Cat on a Hot Tin Roof appeared first on Mark8ng.com.

Abbreviation

TKILTCAM stands for “The Sky Is Low, the Clouds Are Mean”;

BBTWW stands for “Blow, Blow, Thou Winter Wind”.

Poets

Although TKILTCAM by Emily Dickinson and BBTWW by William Shakespeare are about the rough weather, they have different themes, messages, meanings, and endings.

Concepts of Poems

TKILTCAM is a gloomy poem about storms and uses several negative words such as “mean”, “debates”, and “complains” to portray the negative theme. On the other hand, BBTWW by William Shakespeare is about enjoying life even if the winter is rough. “Freeze, freeze thou bitter sky” reflects the mood of the poem. However, the mood changes later as the words become more positive such as “Then, heigh-ho, the holly! This life is most jolly.”

Similarities of Poems

There are some similarities as well. Both poems suggest that weather could be bad and influencing. In TKILTCAM, “Nature, like us, is sometimes caught without her diadem” highlights that nature is not always nice just as someone caught without his/her crown. In BBTWW, “Freeze, freeze, thou bitter sky, That dost not bite so nigh As benefits forgot. Though thou the waters warp, Thy sting is not so sharp” reveals that winter is not as bad as it seems.

Conclusion

To conclude, both poems are beautifully written to show the contrasts of the weather and how they affect one’s moods. TKILTCAM is just about how nature is not always so kind and doesn’t have a jolly ending. It is the reason I liked BBTWW more than TKILTCAM because it conveys the message that you can be happy even in the cold, chilling winters.

The post TKILTCAM and BBTWW, Comparison of Poems appeared first on Mark8ng.com.

Introduction

Percy Wyndham Lewis (1882-1957) is widely acknowledged as one of the greatest English legendary, artistic and literary polymath of the twentieth century. Not only he made wonderful contributions to the visual arts but he also rendered great services for the society with his influential work as a painter. Moreover, he worked as a draughtsman and a graphic artist. Lewis is also renowned for writing a lot of fictional literature, poetry and literary censure. While his novels were considered harshly satirist by a lot of people, he also appraised the contemporaries of his time in an intensely unfeeling manner (Edwards 2000). He was one of the few main figures who encouraged vorticism, an English futuristic art movement before the beginning of the World War I (Glover 2008). Vorticism was devoted “to simplify forms into machinelike angularity” (“vorticism” 2013). Lewis is also famous for his significant impact on the visual arts development during the twentieth century (Glover 2008).

Percy Wyndham Lewis cofounded a magazine related to vorticism in 1914-1915 and named it Blast. It is important to mention here that his paintings were not limited to the vorticists’ cubism. Lewis contributed significantly by producing several conventional works due to which he gained vital acknowledgment and appreciation. His paintings can be found in a number of museums that also include the world-famous Tate Gallery in London and the Museum of Modern Art in NYC. Being an author, Lewis enjoys a significant position due to his semi-philosophical and iconoclastic literary works including Self Condemned, Time and Western Man, The Apes of God, The Revenge for Love, The Writer and the Absolute, The Art of Being Ruled, Bombardiering, The Childermass and Rude Assignment (“Lewis, Wyndham” 2013).

Lewis’ Influence as a Neoclassical Artist

Lewis was a true neoclassical artist as the standard of his artwork was very high and he always tried to give a sensationally new feel to his art work. The amazing thing about his work was he always displayed the absolute control of expressions. He can be considered genuinely influential to both culture and society as he never made monotonous duplicates of his previously-made creations. Instead, he was able in producing original and inventive pieces consistently and this guaranteed a high standard production always. But, he took more risks as compared to other artists as he whipped out ordinary and inoffensive stuff due to his zealous nature that yearned for uniqueness and unmatched individuality (Edwards 2000).

Thus, instead of simply creating something absolutely unique, Lewis was able to put across culture in a natural manner with all its fundamental elements. As a neo classical artist, Lewis was influential enough to display finesse in his works and regained the missing elements that might have lost into his unconsciousness. Due to this impressive characteristic, Lewis acquired inimitable popularity and success (Edwards 2000).

Lewis Painting Style

Percy Wyndham Lewis also applied opulent and smart styles that led him to create some of the most enchanting paintings including Ezra Pound, Mexican Shawl, Miss Close, Newfoundland, Pensive Head, The Crowd, Workshop, Creation Myth etc. He made use of delicate colors and oil on canvas works for the depiction of strong emotions. Most of his paintings reflect perfect, predetermined and serious tones. However, some of them are also a reflection of lifeless sensuality and private expressions. It can be said that Lewis introduced an interesting trend in the form of neoclassicism and treated classic themes in an entirely different way that was not known to his contemporaries and those before him (Edwards 2000).

A technique, ‘Burying Euclid deep in the living flesh’, was also devised by Lewis. Several of his portraits embed geometrical shapes and this particular feature makes them rather appealing and attention-grabbing and frequently far better than the portraits made by the Royal Academicians of that era (Davies 2008). Lewis was a staunch believer in the uniqueness and individuality of a human being. This is the major reason why almost all of his portraits reflect a devotion to coin an image that will set for this exceptional and distinctive being. He has successfully made everyone of his characters into a different pictorial creature and has given it a perfectly classic shape (Edwards 2000).

Thus, it is not a surprise that more or less each of his triumphant images is of his most powerfully individuating sitters. It won’t be incorrect to state that Lewis has made immortals in the form of his portraits. The man or woman who sat for him to be portrayed was given a shape by him that was their own in real life. His trick was the deployment of geometry at both levels; macroscopic and microscopic. He was not only a master of structuring the whole figure of his sitters but also mastered the characterization of details (Edwards 2000). The best examples of this skill are evident in the heads of Pound and Spender. He has molded each part in a distinct manner. The shaping sense of Lewis “picks out the arch of an eyebrow, the curl of a lip, the twist of a lock of hair, and establishes its identity” (“Was Percy Wyndham Lewis the greatest portraitist of his time? – Features – Art – The Independent” 2008).

If his portraits are closely observed, they portray every bit of an individual. He spots everything from head to toe. The best thing about him is that he gave individual treatment to everything he sees. This makes him a perfect observer and portraitist. Those who follow Lewis as their mentor have a lot to learn as he offers great shaping techniques.

Lewis Writing Style

As far as his writings are concerned, the fiction written by Lewis was often full of harsh, satirical descriptions of his clientele whose thoughtfulness and sympathy were greatly disliked by him. This is an interesting thing that his portraits rarely reflected this resentment. However, his explosive swings between closeness and antagonism for a person totally describes this. It is evident in the fact that he openly criticized famous people like Nancy Cunard, Virginia Woolf etc in his literary works but did not portrayed them unsympathetically in his portraits of them. Lewis influence on the society and culture was immense. It is because people purchase portraits and do not give money to someone who assassinates their characters in a pictographic form. However, Lewis’ case was different. He was so talented that people paid him commissions despite of his thorny and insulting conduct (Davies 2008).

Though Lewis cannot be considered the greatest portraitist the world has witnessed, he was undoubtedly one of those who had been given talent by nature. His work is really interesting as it has “given us a wonderful set of visual images of those prominent in the literary world of the inter-war period; indeed this is how their appearances came to be recognized and remembered” (Davies 2008).

Lewis Vision

Lewis was among those cultural intellectual figures that straightforwardly refused to accept the concepts of bourgeois liberalism and democracy. Throughout the course of his life, Lewis suffered from poverty. Thus, his aim was to do something for the betterment of the artists and gain respect for them in the society. He wished for a society where artists could be honored for their hard work. He believed that humanity was in fact ruled by the artists and therefore he resented everyone that considered art as an article of trade that was sold. His artistic nature molded his outlook towards politics and society. He strongly opposed the dominance of politics and money matters over the culture of a society. This is the reason why he strongly supported Fascism (Bolton 2003).

Conclusion

To cut a long story short, Wyndham Lewis is perhaps the most important twentieth century British artist-writer who introduced the ground-breaking forward-looking and revolutionary modernism in Britain before the First World War This revolution helped London to turn into a global The sad thing is that till now, a lot of general readers and art lovers are not familiar with his name and a lot of specialists have not understood him fully (Humphreys 2004). Nevertheless, of what we do know is that Wyndham Lewis is a true painter and the leader of the Vorticist movement (Edwards 2000).

In short, Wyndham Lewis was the one who introduced this concept and which is greatly acknowledged for being the only significant painting-related English school (Wagner 1957). The outspoken nature of Lewis and his satire stands him apart from the other belonging to the similar fields. Being a prolific writer about society and culture and politics, he introduced ideas that were controversial but admired by many (Edwards 2000).

References

Bolton, K. R. Thinkers of the Right: Challenging Materialism . Luton: Luton Publications, 2003.

Edwards, P. Wyndham Lewis: Painter and Writer . London: Yale University Press, 2000.

Glover, M. “Brilliant Cruelty; Wyndham Lewis’s Portraits Are Wonderfully Ruthless Appraisals of the Literati of His Time.” New Statesman (1996), July 21, 2008. http://www.questia.com/read/1G1-182045253/brilliant-cruelty-wyndham-lewis-s-portraits-are-wonderfully (accessed September 8, 2013).

Humphreys, R. Wyndham Lewis. London: Tate, 2004.

“Lewis, Wyndham from The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th ed..” Questia. http://www.questia.com/read/1E1-LewisWy/lewis-wyndham (accessed September 8, 2013).

“Was Wyndham Lewis the greatest portraitist of his time? – Features – Art – The Independent.” The Independent | News | UK and Worldwide News | Newspaper. http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/features/was-wyndham-lewis-the-greatest-portraitist-of-his-time-861134.html (accessed September 8, 2013).

“vorticism from The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th ed..” Questia. 2013. http://www.questia.com/read/1E1-vorticis/vorticism (accessed September 8, 2013).

Wagner, G. Wyndham Lewis: A Portrait of the Artist as the Enemy. London: Routledge, 1957.

The post Percy Wyndham Lewis Great Legend of 20th Century appeared first on Mark8ng.com.

Introduction

To deliver a good speech with the capability of grasping the audience’s attention and convincing them is not an easy task. In fact, the deliverance of an influential and persuasive speech requires a lot of preparation and the knowledge of rhetoric devices. The detailed analysis of the style of famous speakers can help in discovering the secret of their success and assess their techniques in building the connection with the audience. The approaches can greatly vary ascan be observed in the case of the speeches by Martin Luther King and Sam Berns. However, the main task is to provoke the listeners for some thought process and actions.

Speech By Martin Luther King

The speech, “The Street Sweeper” or “The Three Dimensions of a Complete Life”, was delivered on April 9^th, 1967, at New Covenant Baptist Church in Chicago (Free My People, 2016). The manner in which Martin Luther King speaks is very emotional and expressive. He uses many rhetorical pauses to highlight the most important moments of the message and interacts with the public (that supports the speaker with exclamations). In addition, the speaker seems to have chosen a perfect topic and place for the speech as it relies on Christian beliefs and references the Bible: “You shall reap what you sow”. To make his words more credible and persuasive to the audience, Martin Luther King uses a real example of the street sweeper. He mentions this common but unpopular profession to convince the people that any job should be done properly. The speaker uses simple words and short sentences to make the speech understandable for the broader audience and ties all his beliefs to the real life. He emphasizes that doing everything in the best way possible is not enough. In fact, it is also necessary to possess a clear mind and kind intentions.

The words of Martin Luther King are met with applauses because of the demonstration of his logical and expressive ideas that correspond to the beliefs of the listeners. In this manner, he was triumphant in inspiring people to take significant actions and giving them the appropriate advices to change their lives.

Speech by Sam Berns

On the other hand, “My philosophy for a happy life” speech is presented in a typical TEDx Talks format where the speaker can be seen making use of bright humor and references to his life (TEDx Talks, 2013). Sam Berns, a patient with the rare illness known as Progeria, shares his thoughts and perspectives with the healthy people to share his secret of happiness. The main effect of this speech is built on the contrast between the stereotypes about the people who live with severe diseases and the real case of Sam Berns – an individual who is absolutely satisfied with his life. During the whole speech, the speaker relies on his personal experience and mentions three components of happiness. He supports all his statements by sharing the actual examples from his life.

In this manner, Sam Berns makes the speech more credible and realistic. Moreover, he looks genuinely content with his life reflected in his positive tone and cheerful mood. Sam supports his ideas with the references of famous peoples’ quotations – people who managed to achieve greatness during their lives. The speaker uses humor to establish a close connection with the audience and is perfectly successful in doing so. The message of this speech is clear and logical: if the boy with the Progeria is happy, any healthy person has all the reasons to be happy too.

Conclusion of Comparative Analysis

Despite the fact that the two discussed speeches have a lot of differences, both of them are convincing and use a great variety of rhetorical devices. The speakers manage to convey their ideas to the audience to inspire them to change their minds and act positively different. Martin Luther King is more emotional and expressive especially when he presents the words of God. He does not refer to his life but uses the story of the street sweeper – an individual who believes in doing his job with honesty. In contrast, Sam Berns uses his personal example and tells about the simple joys of life to let the audience understand the essence of happiness. Both speeches prove that it is excessively important to take the potential audience, time, circumstances of the speech, usage of bright examples, and interaction with the public into account. All these characteristics make it possible for one to become a successful speaker.

References

TEDx Talks. (2013, Dec 13). My philosophy for a happy life | Sam Berns | TEDxMidAtlantic. [Video file]. Tedx. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36m1o-tM05g

Free My People. (2016, Apr 9). “The Street Sweeper” Speech by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. [Video file]. Free My People. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozwv1Va4RpE

The post Comparative Analysis of the Speech MLK appeared first on Mark8ng.com.

Introduction

Eric Butterworth’s The Creative Life: 7 Keys to Your Inner Genius is a remarkably well-researched and well-written work encompassing numerous aspects of spirituality that allow the readers to gain a divine insight concerning the process of creation. According to Butterworth’s perspective, all individuals possess have a unique, concealed intellect within themselves that makes it possible for them to understand and comprehend the significance of spiritualism accordingly. His discussion revolves around the notion that all human beings – who believe in god – may find him and their true spiritual self with the demonstration of passion accompanied by obligation, obedience, and eagerness. Without a doubt, Butterworth has been triumphant in presenting a comprehensive work that would certainly be regarded as an extremely powerful and innovative book with regards to spiritualism in the coming years.

Contents of The Book

As far as the contents of the book are concerned, The Creative Life explores the seven keys that may help the readers to let go of their inner creative genius. The most outstanding characteristic of the book is that all the chapters include practical and efficient exercises for enabling the readers to implement the offered ideas in their routines. Regardless of the small size of the book (150+ pages only), it offers extremely resonant and vast ideas that are sure to broaden the thinking capacity of the reader. There are a lot of underlying meanings that can be found throughout the book. Almost every page makes the reader acknowledge the fact that one can find god within him/her irrespective of his/her origin and physical characteristics (Butterworth). He says, “God is in us, not like a raisin in a bun but like the ocean in a wave” (as qt in Belmessieri 34).

Discovery of Eric Butterworth

Eric Butterworth insists his readers to seek ways to discover their unique creativeness and adopt new approaches to find and nourish their spiritual selves. He advises his readers to remain in touch with their innovative selves and inspired from surroundings (Butterworth).  Referring to Genesis, he talks about the 7 days repeatedly and every chapter discusses one day individually to let the readers understand the lessons. The notion that the world was created in 7 days is brilliantly explored and investigated by Butterworth whereby he discusses the significance of all the seven days and how they carried different motivating implications and bestowing creativity to mankind.

Drawbacks of The Creative Life

As mentioned above, the exercises in the book are useful for readers in helping them to unleash the creativity granted to every individual. Considering that some propositions within the book are controversial (such as the differentiation between Jesus and the Christ), The Creative Life is suitable for readers who are interested in knowing the relationship that connects creativity and spirituality. It is recommended that all exercises are done sincerely to acquire the offered benefits and to comprehend the point of view of the author. As far as the drawbacks of The Creative Life are concerned, the author fails to appreciate the fact that every person reading the book is uninventive and uncreative. For the same reason, it becomes rather difficult at many times to follow Butterworth’s actual guidelines. It would have been better if Butterworth had included real-life, common examples to value individual creativity of his readers.

Conclusion

To conclude, Butterworth has been successful in writing a valuable book to inspire people to recognize, acknowledge, and furnish their creative sides.

References

Belmessieri, Debbie. Tapping into God: experiencing the spiritual spectrum. Bloomington, IN: Balboa Press, 2011. Print.

Butterworth, Eric. The creative life: seven keys to your inner genius. New York: J.P. Tarcher/Putnam, 2001. Print.

The post “The Creative Life” by Eric Butterworth appeared first on Mark8ng.com.

Laertes’ Response to Polonius’ Death

In Shakespeare’s play Hamlet, Laertes is one of the main characters. He is Polonius’ son and Ophelia’s brother. He has been shown as an aggressive man who immediately prepares himself to take the revenge of his murdered father. After Polonius was killed by Hamlet, Laertes immediately decides to take instant vengeance. As soon as he hears about his father’s murder, Laertes leaves France with a great number of his followers so that he could invade the Danish palace and overrun the King. His hostile and antagonistic nature is clearly mirrored when he expresses his feelings, “How came he dead? I’ll not be juggled with: To hell, allegiance! Vows, to the blackest devil! Conscience and grace, to the profoundest pit! I dare damnation. To this point I stand, That both the worlds I give to negligence, Let come what comes; only I’ll be revenged Most thoroughly for my father” (4.5.6).

Although Polonius was loved by Laertus, he is not shown upset by his father’s death. Instead, he demonstrates a behavior that is too numb and foiled by revengeful feelings. After knowing that the King Claudius was not responsible for Polonius’ death and learning that Hamlet was the killer, Laertus shows hateful feelings towards Hamlet. However, Hamlet was forgiven by Laertus later as he says “I am satisfied in nature, Whose motive in this case should stir me most To my revenge. But in my terms of honor I stand aloof, and will no reconcilement! Till by some elder masters, of known honor, I have a voice and precedent of peace To keep my name ungored. But till that time I do receive your offered love like love, And will not wrong it” (5.2.235-243).

Ophelia’s Reaction to Polonius’ Death

Ophelia is the main female character in Hamlet. She was Polonius’ daughter and Laertes’ sister. She loves Hamlet beyond imagination. She goes completely mad after her father’s death as compared to her brother who doesn’t loses his mind but seeks out to take revenge of his father’s blood. Her grief for her father makes her talk in rhyme and conundrums. Now and then she is shown to hum crazy songs regarding death and lewd songs about lost virginity. She shows her mad feelings by singing “He is dead and gone, lady, He is dead and gone; At his head a grass-green turf, At his heels a stone” (4.5.29-32), clearly showing sadness over her father’s death and that he won’t return to her. The character of Ophelia is a sensitive one which expresses intermingled thoughts that carry great meaning and grief.

Comparison of Reactions and How they Illuminate Hamlet’s Situation

Whereas Laertes shows a revengeful behavior after his father’s death, the reaction of Ophelia is completely different making her going mad. As far as Hamlet is concerned, he had the same situation of a murdered father but he didn’t show the same response of aggression as Laertes did. As a hero, it is unexpected of Hamlet to show such weakness. Similarly, he is not much concerned about Ophelia’s affectionate feelings towards him until after her shocking death. Therefore, it can be concluded that Hamlet is surely a unique character in the sense that he didn’t demonstrate the same courage as Laertes and even the warm side of a human being towards his/her lover.

Reference

Shakespeare, William. “Hamlet.” 5th ed. Great Britain: Oxford University Press (2009). Print.
 
Home » Literature

The post Hamlet and reaction after the death of Polonius appeared first on Mark8ng.com.